Barks Publications, Inc., publishers of Electrical Apparatus Magazine
Barks Publications, Inc.

                    Home | Electrical Apparatus | ElectroMechanical Bench Reference | Barks Books     

     
 

a feature from 
May 2003

Electrical Apparatus

The Magazine of Electrical &
Electronic Application & Maintenance


On this page is a summary of a feature from our May issue ...

Order copies of this issue

 


Current Issue Table of Contents
Publisher's Market Memo
About Electrical Apparatus
Subscription Information
Advertising Information
Staff

 
 

Electrical Apparatus' May 2003 issue includes the feature, "The why and how of transposed conductors" ...by Richard L. Nailen, EA Engineering Editor 


 
Electrical Apparatus May 2003  

 Summary: "Verifying" Motor Efficiency: No Easy Task"

With trilingual summary

By Richard L. Nailen, EA Engineering Editor

Most standard general purpose three-phase induction motors sold in the United States (regardless of where they're manufactured) must now exhibit full-load efficiencies as tabulated in the Energy Policy Act (EPACT) of 1992. Defined as "nominal," such an efficiency represents an average for a large number of motors of identical design.

The same efficiencies are required by standards of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), and are to be marked on the motor nameplate. For each individual motor, the NEMA standards also tabulate a required "minimum" efficiency, representing a motor loss 20% greater than that associated with the nominal efficiency.

A user concerned about the efficiency of a single motor must understand that because the nominal efficiency is an average value, it cannot be verified by testing any single unit. The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) has therefore established an efficiency enforcement procedure. If a user has reason to believe (usually from a laboratory test) that a motor does not meet the law's requirement, a complaint to the DOE initiates a sampling process imposed upon the manufacturer. Several motors are tested and the results analyzed according to a complex statistical procedure; a decision is then made as to whether or not the product complies with the law.

Some agencies have evaluated motor performance by a test program classifying motor designs into three categories. A fully acceptable "green" group exhibits nominal afficiencies meeting both NEMA and EPACT levels, and minimum efficiencies within the NEMA requirement. An unacceptable "red" group fails both of those criteria. In between, a "yellow" group meets the NEMA minimum efficiency, but testing indicates that an average (nominal) efficiency may be too low. Only the DOE sampling procedure can evaluate performance in that category.

In any event, the only useful tests are those performed under laboratory conditions in facilities certified by the Department of Energy. Field tests cannot be expected to match those conditions.

Copyright 2003, Barks Publications, Inc., Chicago.  Reproduction by any means prohibited.

 
 
From  "The why and how of transposed conductors" 
by Richard L. Nailen, EA Engineering Editor  - 
published in Electrical Apparatus May 2003.
 

Order individual copies of the magazine

Subscribe to Electrical Apparatus

About Electrical Apparatus

 
 

Barks Publications, Inc.
400 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 900
Chicago IL 60611-4104

Phone: (312) 321-9440
Fax: (312) 321-1288


E-mail: info@barks.com
Please include your name and contact information.

Contents of this site Copyright 2000-2008 by Barks Publications, Inc.